Click here to skip navigation American Public Transportation Association Visit the APTA Bookstore
My APTA
What's New
About APTA
For Members
Committees
Conferences & Calendar
Services & Programs
Government Affairs
Industry Information
APTA Standards Program
Media Center
e-Business
Passenger Transport
Book Store
Links
Contact Us
Site Map
Home
Rail and Bus LinksThe Rail Station
July 05, 2008
APTA    Search: Click here to search
APTA > About APTA > APTA Committees > Passenger Rail Equipment Safety Standards Task Force  

APTA PRESS Task Force Meeting Minutes--March 26, 1998

Downtown Marriott Hotel,
Philadelphia, PA

Quorum: 23 members (10 systems, 9 associate and 4 labor) out of 30 currently appointed voting members attended, thus establishing a quorum. Voting members attending - Systems: Amtrak, Conn-DOT, Long Island Rail Road, Metra, MARC, Metro-North Railroad, New Jersey Transit, Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation Authority, Southern California Regional Railroad Authority and MBTA; Labor: Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, United Transportation Union, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers and Brotherhood Railway Carmen; Associate: Adtranz, Bombardier, Coach and Car Equipment Corporation, G.E. Transportation Systems, General Motors Locomotive Group - Electro-Motive Division, Nippon Sharyo, Siemens Transportation Systems, Knorr and WABCO. (See the attached list for the names of individual members attending the meeting.)

Chairman Mike Wetherell called the meeting to order at 7:35 a.m. The agenda for the meeting is attached to the minutes.

Anti-Trust Statement:

Mr. Tom Peacock reviewed the APTA PRESS Bylaws Anti-Trust Statement.

Comments of William W. Millar, President of APTA

Mr. Wetherell introduced William W. Millar, the President of APTA. Mr. Millar stated his strong support of the PRESS process and thanked railroad members, labor members, builder/supplier members and government members for the important role that each plays in the standards setting process. He also individually thanked the APTA staff members that provide the behind the scenes support that keeps the Task Force going.

Introduction of New Participants

Chairman Wetherell introduced the following new participants on the PRESS Task Force:

    • Bill Bohne represents the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) is a new voting member;
    • Gary Fairbanks represents FRA on the structural and construction committee;
    • Tom Rowbottom representing SEPTA;
    • Steve Hilbert representing SEPTA; and
    • David Bremner representing J.T. Nelson

PRESS Task Force Meeting Minutes – 1/22/98

Mr. Wetherell asked if there were any changes or corrections to the minutes of the PRESS Task Force Meeting held on 1/22/98 in Washington D.C. Hearing none, a move was made and seconded to approve the minutes as written. The motion passed.

Review of March 25th Committee Meetings:

Mr. Wetherell asked the committee chairs to review the progress made by their respective committees.

Construction/Structural Committee

Ken Barnish reported that the Construction/Structural Committee met in February at Metro-North Headquarters to review the standards presented for voting today. The committee spent the majority of their time at yesterday’s meeting responding to comments received from members on these standards. The committee decided to delay the vote on the interior fittings standard and the interior fittings recommended practice until the June Task Force Meeting. The committee may combine these two documents into a single standard.

Kris Severson-Green gave an update on the three projects managed by the Volpe Center—glazing, passenger seats and crash energy management—which directly support standards under development by the committee. She expects the contract for the glazing research to be awarded in approximately six weeks.

Ron Mayville gave the committee an update on the work being done by Arthur D. Little on Crash Energy Management. The Volpe Center will soon release a formal report on this work.

Rich Shults reported on the fire safety standards work being done by the NFPA 130 group. The group met in Philadelphia yesterday.

The committee must tackle the issue of metric vs. English units in standards. Ken wishes to bring the issue to a vote at the June Task Force meeting. An issue paper intended to make Task Force members aware of the pros and cons each system of units is included as an attachment to these minutes. Please review the paper to help determine how to vote.

Ken appealed to Task Force members for a donation of a walkover type seat for the seat attachment strength tests to be conducted as part of the FRA sponsored research program. If your organization can donate a seat of this type, please contact Ken at (914) 271-1656.

The Structural/Construction committee will meet May 4&5 in Phoenix to finalize the corner post, cab seating and other standards to be brought before the Task Force for a vote in June.

Mechanical Committee

Dave Carter reported that the mechanical committee spent the majority of their time yesterday responding to comments from members on the three documents that the group submitted for balloting. The committee considered all the comments on these documents and made changes in response to most of them.

The committee also spent time reviewing the activity of the sub-group working on low-speed, wheel-climb derailments. This group will hold its next meeting at New Jersey Transit Headquarters in Newark on April 22. This group will meet again on May 11 in Chicago. This is the day before the two-day ARM conference that includes topics on the same subject. The committee has targeted December for the completion of this subgroup’s work product.

The mechanical committee sub-group, led by Brad Black and Greg Gagarin, working on up-dating wheel standards will meet at MARC’s BWI Rail Station offices on April 8.

The committee plans to have compressed air quality and new truck design standards ready for a vote in June. The entire committee will meet near the end of April to review drafts of these standards.

Electrical Committee

Dave Elliott, substituting for Doug Warner, reported that committee responded to members comments on the storage battery recommended practice. The committee spent the majority of its time yesterday in a line-by-line review of the EMI/EMC draft standard. The committee has 8 remaining standards and recommended practices under development. They plan to bring the following four before the Task Force for a vote at the June meeting: EMI/EMC, Head End Power, Wire and Cable, and Lighting.

The committee’s next meeting will be held at APTA’s offices on April 28&29.

Systems Committee

Passenger Systems

Jack Reidy reported on passenger systems group’s progress. Duke Zimmerman of Globe Transportation Graphics gave a presentation on rail car emergency signs. Mr. Zickerman reported on fire test methods and fire safety analysis. Stephanie Markos and J.K. Pollard reported the results of their lighting level measurements in Conn-DOT and MBTA cars.

Bill Lydon presented and proposed new approaches to the group for time driven emergency evacuation standards and emergency lightning standards based on a "guiding path" rather than a light level. The group agreed to pursue these concepts.

A sub-group will meet in Wilmington, Delaware on April 6 to work on the emergency sign standards. More face-to-face meetings will be scheduled to pursue the two new concepts in the near future.

Maintenance

Rich Conway reported on maintenance group progress. The group spent time yesterday responding to comments from members on the door maintenance recommended practice. However, periodic maintenance was the focus of the group’s work.

Mr. Conway reported broader participation on the committee and a very good response to his appeal to commuter railroads for their maintenance plans and practices. The committee has a list of safety related car components that need to be included in the periodic maintenance program. The committee spent the majority of their time discussing how to attack the tougher problem of maintenance intervals.

Discussion with FRA representatives indicated willingness on FRA’s part to consider alternatives to strictly time based intervals. FRA would consider flexibility to allow railroads to change initially established intervals as long as a good basis for the change is presented and documented.

The committee made work assignments to prepare for their next meeting to be held on May 5 in South Carolina. The committee intends to have the handbrake maintenance standard ready for a vote at the June meeting.

Dan Foth asked for a few minutes of the Maintenance Committee Report to discuss a Federal Transit Administration (FTA) need for "Rail Car Fleet Management Plans". FTA must respond a concern of the inspector general on high spare car ratios in the rail transit community. In the future, each commuter railroad may be required to submit a "Rail Car Fleet Management Plan" to FTA. APTA will continue to work with FTA to determine what will be required.

Federal Railroad Administration Observations

Grady Cothen of FRA’s Office of Safety spent the day yesterday observing the work of each of the PRESS Task Force Committees. Chairman Wetherell asked Mr. Cothen for some reaction to what he observed. Mr. Cothen expressed encouragement to the Task Force members to continue their good work on tough issues. He specifically mentioned the following as high interest safety items to FRA:

    • wheel climb derailments;
    • corner posts--cab cars and MU’s have a serious vulnerability that must be decreased;
    • emergency lighting, signs and evacuation--resolving these issues requires creativity;

Mr. Cothen complimented the Electrical Committee on the thoroughness of their review of the EMI/EMC standard. He considers this an extremely important issue particularly as it may affect future automatic train control systems.

Grady expressed strong support for the research and development efforts necessary to form a basis for the standards that the Task Force is developing. He explained the ex-parti rules that govern FRA personnel while they resolve issues with the current passenger equipment rulemaking. He assured all parties that they would have an opportunity to comment on the final rule.

Mike Wetherell thanked Grady for spending time with the committees and for his interest in and support of PRESS activities.

Proposed By-Law Change

Voting at the last PRESS Task Force meeting revealed a need to re-examine the voting procedure setout in the by-laws. The by-laws currently require a 75% majority of the voting members present for a standard or recommended practice to be adopted. Several of the supply members and some of the labor members chose not to vote on some documents. When a voting member is present and elects not to vote, the result is the equivalent of a negative vote. In many instances, the voting members wished not to vote because they felt not qualified or their organization had no interest in the subject. They did not intend to cast a negative vote.

To solve this problem, the executive committee examined the by-laws. The executive committee recommended the attached proposed amendment to the by-laws. This proposed amendment has the effect of requiring a 75% majority of the voting members that chose to vote for a standard or recommended practice to be adopted.

The chair received a motion to amend the by-laws as proposed in the attachment. The motion was seconded and passed without opposition. The chair placed the new voting procedure into effect immediately.

Discussion of EMI/EMC Standard

Richard Benjamin and Carl Herrmann presented the basic concept of the proposed EMI/EMC standard. The standard essentially specifies a process to be followed, but it does not attempt to set levels that must be met.

Member Comment Procedures

Mr. Peacock asked members about the comment period procedures used to prepare for this meeting that gave committee chairs and staff advisors another few days to reply to members comments on documents presented for voting. Members generally agreed this approach is an improvement over getting all the comments the morning of their committee. As a result, Mr. Peacock proposed the following schedule for getting standard before the Task Force at the June meeting:

May 18 – final drafts due to APTA

May 19 – APTA mails drafts with comment sheets to all members

June 8 – all comments due back to APTA

June 9 – all comments distributed to Committee Chairs

June 15 – Committee meetings

June 16 -- Task Force Meeting

Voting on Standards and Recommended Practices

Eight standards/recommended practices were brought before the Task Force for voting. The author of each standard/recommended practice presented the document to the Task Force and described how the committee responsible for the document responded to the recommended changes. After each presentation, the Chair asked for discussion and presentation of any significant opposition. After this discussion, the Chair called for a vote on each document in its turn. The chair conducted a role call voice vote backed-up by a written ballot collected by APTA. The written ballots will be kept on file by APTA.

The attached table contains the detailed results of the balloting. Seven of the eight standards/recommended practices were adopted by the required 75% majority of the voting that chose to vote. In addition, a list of the correct titles and numbers of all the standards and recommended practices adopted by the Task Force to-date is attached.

Standards vs. Recommended Practices

In response to comments received from members, the mechanical committee decided to upgrade the recommended practice for new locomotive parking brakes to a safety standard. This proposed changed evoked a discussion among the Task Force members. Several expressed a concern that their organizations reviewed the document as a recommended practice, not as a safety standard. Perhaps their organizations would have a different set of comments on the document proposed as a standard. Based on this discussion, Chairman Wetherell decided to delay vote on this standard until the June meeting.

As can be seen in the attached table summarizing the votes, the four labor voting members present voted against the door maintenance recommended practice because they have a strong opinion that the document should be a standard. Several members suggested that the Task Force needs a clear policy on how to determine whether a document is a standard or a recommended practice. The chair agreed to put together a small group consisting of the executive committee and 2-3 labor members to recommend a policy to the task force. Tom Peacock will obtain background information on how other standards setting organizations have addressed this problem for the policy group to consider. Greg Gagarin asked that the policy take into account the possibility of a recommended practice that applies to a safety critical system or component.

Discussion of Implementation and Effective Date of Single Car Test Standard

Tom Peacock reported that Dan Alpert of FRA contacted him concerning implementation of the new passenger coach single car test standard. For FRA to include this standard as part of the passenger safety standards rule, it must be formally implemented by APTA and have an effective date. The PRESS By-Laws requires approval of the commuter railroad CEO’s for final implementation of standards adopted by the PRESS Task Force.

New Business

Gord Campbell asked for a more consistent approach to the mark-up of documents to respond to comments received from members. Some authors have complete bold new text and strikeout of old text versions for members to see before voting. Others only summarize how comments were incorporated into revised versions of the documents. Ed Murphy suggested this as another topic for the executive committee meeting.

David Elliott asked that the executive committee give guidance on the use of the words should/shall as part of their policy on standards vs. recommended practices.

Mike Nolan asked about standards governing the installation of electrical outlets on passenger seats. Dave Elliot responded that the electrical standards on wiring and ground fault detection adopted at the January meeting should apply.

Ed Murphy and Stephanie Markos announced an emergency lighting demonstration to be conducted in a darkened SEPTA MU car positioned at Suburban Station, track 0, starting at 1:00 p.m. Various types and levels of lighting will be demonstrated—including the use of a cold smoke generator to simulate smoke-obscured visual conditions.

Members brought up no further new business.

Adjournment

The Task Force meeting adjourned at 11:30 a.m.

Click here to return to the Passenger Rail Equipment Safety Standards Task Force page.

Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.