|
|
| August 28, 2008 |
|
APTA >
Government Affairs >
APTA Testimony
TRANSIT NEEDS SYNTHESIS REPORT
Preliminary
February 25, 2002
Estimates of transit capital needs in specific categories have been
made by the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), the Federal Transit
Administration (FTA), and the Community Transportation Association of America (CTAA). This
paper summarizes a number of existing estimates and translates them into comparable FY
2003 dollars.
Estimated Total Six-Year Capital Needs: $253 billion, FY 2003 dollars.
Draft estimated total transit industry needs from all sources for
capital, planning, and research funds from FY 2004 through FY 2009 will be $253 billion,
an average of $42 billion per year, measured in FY 2003 dollars. This draft amount is
intended to include all potential investment in transit in an unconstrained environment.
These needs include funds from all levels of government including federal transit funds,
funds from other federal sources, state funds, local government funds, passenger fares,
and private funding sources. Only activities which are eligible uses for federal funding
are included. Funding for operating needs not eligible by law for federal funding are
excluded. The level of needs by purpose are reported on Table 1.
Table 1: Summary of Needs From Prior Studies from All Levels of
Government
Category of Need
and Source |
Amounts Reported
in Studies |
Amounts in
Projected FY 2003 Dollars |
Year of Study |
Annual Average (Billions) |
FY 2004 - FY 2009 Total
(Billions) |
Annual Average (Billions) |
FY 2004 - FY 2009 Total
(Billions) |
| New Starts, Based on FTA Report |
2001 |
11.57 |
69.40 |
12.38 |
74.30 |
| Fixed-Guideway Modernization, Based on FTA
Report |
2000 |
5.37 |
32.21 |
6.26 |
37.52 |
| Bus and Bus Equipment, APTA Report |
2000 |
6.55 |
39.28 |
7.43 |
44.56 |
| Core Capacity, APTA Rail Transit CEOs
Subcommittee Survey |
2001 |
6.12 |
36.70 |
6.46 |
38.75 |
| Incremental Needs of Small Transit Intensive
Cities, Based on FTA Report |
2000 |
0.05 |
0.30 |
0.06 |
0.37 |
| Rural and Small UZA Needs, Based on CTAA
Report |
2003 |
2.80 |
16.80 |
2.80 |
16.80 |
| Other Needs Eligible for Federal Funding, APTA
Estimate |
2003 |
6.75 |
40.51 |
6.75 |
40.51 |
| Total Needs |
--- |
39.21 |
235.20 |
42.14 |
252.81 |
|
|
Two amounts are reported for average annual need and for six-year total
need. The first pair of amounts are dollars as reported in or estimated from each source.
The second pair of amounts are the dollars reported in each study inflated to FY 2003
dollars. Consumer price index values used to project FY 2003 dollars are taken from The
Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002-2011, Congressional Budget Office,
January 2001. The procedures followed to arrive at each of these amounts are described in
the following sections.
Also reported for comparison, on Page 7, are need levels derived from
expanding information presented in the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) 1999
Conditions and Performance (C&P) report, May 2000.
New Starts, $69.4 billion, Remaining Needs for Projects That Have
Received Appropriations During TEA 21 Period, 2000/2001 dollars.
The Federal Transit Administration submits annually to Congress an Annual
Report on New Starts. The FY 2002 Annual Report on New Starts, May 2001, and Supplemental
Report on New Starts, December 2001, provide extensive funding and needs data for
projects with Full Funding Grant Agreements and in Final Design or Preliminary
Engineering. Limited detail is provided for other authorized projects and projects that
are not authorized but have received appropriations during the TEA 21 period. Table 2
reports detailed needs for the 75 projects that are in Preliminary Engineering or a higher
status in those reports and less detailed estimated needs for 80 additional projects not
yet in Preliminary Engineering but which have received appropriations during the TEA 21
period. The total funds needed to meet the full cost of all projects that have received
some appropriations is estimated to be $83.7 billion. An estimated $14.4 billion of that
need has already been appropriated by the federal government or made available by state
and local governments leaving an unmet need of $69.4 billion.
For purposes of this report all projects that have received
appropriations are anticipated to be ready for full funding from FY 2004 through FY 2009.
Although additional funds will be made available in FY 2003 appropriations, it can be
anticipated that additional projects will advance to the stage at which they need funding.
The amount of funds needed for projects not yet in Preliminary Engineering is estimated
from the average needs of those projects for which cost data are reported.
APTA estimated funding needs for all known new start projects in
"Estimation of Long-Term New Start Program Needs," April 2000. That estimation
was based on data reported in the FY 2001 Annual Report on New Starts, March 2000,
and additional projects reported in APTA's 1999 Transit Fixed Guideway Inventory,
October 1999. The APTA report included 265 projects not listed in the FTA FY 2001
Annual Report on New Starts. The total long-term new start need for all identifiable
projects, excluding those with insufficient data to make estimates, was $147.5 billion.
Approximately $10 billion of this amount had already been provided leaving a net need in
excess of $137.5 billion. In preparation of that estimate, no projects were included that
did not have a minimal amount of information defining project size by number of stations
or miles of route. Had further information been available, the estimate would have been
greater. The estimate used as the primary value in this report, however, included an
estimate for all projects included in the parameters of that estimate.
Fixed-Guideway Modernization: $32.2 billion for Six Years, 1997
dollars.
The Federal Transit Administration is in the process of conducting a
thorough survey of rail modernization needs. The last survey was the Rail Modernization
Study published in April 1987. That study found a rail modernization need of $17.9
billion in 1983 dollars which inflates to $33.6 billion in projected 2003 dollars. The
1987 report included transit operators in only 13 urbanized areas or subareas whereas in
FY 2002 fixed guideway modernization funds were allocated to transit operators in 52
urbanized areas or subareas.
Table 2: New Starts Projects Reported in FY 2002 Annual Report on
New Starts as of November 2000
|
Status of
Project |
Number of
Projects |
Total Funding
Needs for TEA 21 Authorized or Appropriated New Starts Projects (Millions of Dollars) |
Funds Already
Available by FY 2002 and Remaining New Starts Funding Needs (Millions of Dollars) |
Federal Section
5309 Funds |
Other Federal
Funds |
State and Local
Funds |
Total Funds |
Funds Made
Available (a) |
Remaining Needs |
Section 5309 Appro-priations |
Estimated Total All Sources
(b) |
Section 5309 Federal Funds |
Estimated Total All Sources
(b) |
| Full Funding Grant Agreements (Including
Pending) |
28 |
8,453.2 |
1,823.9 |
7,300.7 |
17,577.7 |
4,980.0 |
10,345.5 |
3,473.1 |
7,232.2 |
| Final Design |
9 |
1,456.0 |
167.4 |
1,458.5 |
3,081.9 |
244.4 |
517.4 |
1,213.6 |
2,564.5 |
| Completed Preliminary Engineering (c) |
4 |
129.4 |
21.5 |
55.4 |
206.3 |
38.7 |
61.8 |
90.7 |
144.5 |
| Preliminary Engineering |
27 |
7,691.3 |
930.3 |
6,880.1 |
15,501.6 |
503.2 |
1,014.2 |
7,188.1 |
14,487.4 |
| Completed Alternatives Analysis (c) |
7 |
2,103.4 |
311.8 |
1,997.2 |
4,412.4 |
60.7 |
127.4 |
2,042.7 |
4,285.0 |
| Subtotal Completed Alternatives Analysis of
More Advanced |
75 |
19,833.2 |
3,254.9 |
17,691.8 |
40,779.9 |
5,827.2 |
12,066.3 |
14,008.1 |
28,713.7 |
| Additional Authorized Projects Having Received
Appropriations |
65 |
16,962.6
(b) |
2,783.8
(b) |
15,131.2
(b) |
34,877.6
(b) |
369.0 |
2,000.0
(b) |
16,593.7
(b) |
32,877.6
(b) |
| Additional Projects, Not Authorized, Having
Received Appropriations |
15 |
3,914.5
(b) |
642.4
(b) |
3,491.8
(b) |
8,048.7
(b) |
68.5 |
300.0
(b) |
3,846.0
(b) |
7,748.7
(b) |
| Subtotal Advanced and Receiving
Appropriations |
155 |
40,710.3
(b) |
6,681.0
(b) |
36,314.8
(b) |
83,706.2
(b) |
6,264.6 |
14,366.3
(b) |
34,447.7
(b) |
69,399.9
(b) |
| Additional Authorized Projects Not Yet
Receiving Appropriations |
53 |
13,831.1
(b) |
2,269.8
(b) |
12,337.7
(b) |
28,438.6
(b) |
0.0 |
500.0
(b) |
13,831.1
(b) |
27,938.6
(b) |
| Total Authorized or Appropriated |
208 |
54,541.4
(b) |
8,950.9
(b) |
48,652.6
(b) |
112,144.8
(b) |
6,264.6 |
14,866.3
(b) |
48,278.8
(b) |
97,278.6
(b) |
|
|
(a) Includes FY 2002 appropriations.
(b) Estimated by APTA.
(c) As of August 2001.
The FTA's 1999 Conditions and Performance Report, more throughly
described in the next section, reports needs in categories that can be aggregated to
estimate a rail modernization need figure. Total rail needs to improve conditions and
improve performance for replacement and rehabilitation of vehicles and non-vehicle assets
is $5.37 billion per year in 1997 dollars which inflate to $6.26 billion per year in
projected 2003 dollars. For six years the need is therefore $32.21 billion in 1997 dollars
and $37.52 in projected 2003 dollars. These amounts are included in summary Table 1.
Bus and Bus Equipment: $39.3 billion, FY 2004 through FY 2009,
1998/1999 dollars.
APTA's "Projecting Bus Capital Investment Needs", May 2000,
estimated total bus capital needs for all purposes of $39.3 billion from FY 2004 through
FY 2009. The estimate was made in 1998/1999 dollars. Inflated to 2003 dollars, annual
needs are $7.4 billion and six-year needs are $44.6 billion. Needs by category are shown
on Table 3.
Needs by category are estimated as follows:
Replacement Buses and Vans for Current Fleet: The entire U.S. bus and
van fleet is estimated to be 107,540 vehicles as reported in the APTA 2000 Public
Transportation Fact Book, March 2000. The proportion of the fleet in each of six
vehicle size categories (large buses 51' and longer, large buses 38' to 50', large buses
33' to 38', medium buses 28' to 32', small buses and vans 21' to 27', and vans 20' or
shorter) and the average price for vehicles in those size groups is taken from the APTA 1999
Transit Vehicle Data Book, May 1999. Economic service life for each vehicle group is
taken from Federal Transit Administration (FTA) Circular FTA C 9300.1, Capital Program:
Grant Application Instructions, October 2001. The number of vehicles that reach their
economic age each year in each category is then determined and multiplied by the average
price for vehicles in that group.
New Buses and Vans for Expansion at 4% per Year: The 4 percent per year
expansion is set for illustration purposes; this rate is not an APTA policy.
Table 3: Bus and Bus Equipment Funding Needs from FY 2004 through FY
2009
(1998/1999 Dollars, No Adjustment for Inflation)
|
Need Category |
Average Annual Amount
(Millions of Dollars) |
Six-Year Total
(Millions of Dollars) |
| Replacement Buses and Vans for Current Fleet |
2,254.3 |
13,525.6 |
| New Buses and Vans for Expansion at 4% per
Year |
1,040.2 |
6,241.5 |
| Replacement Buses and Vans for Expansion
Vehicles |
4.0 |
23.8 |
| Maintenance Facility Needs |
730.5 |
4,383.1 |
| Bus Other Needs |
2,516.9 |
15,101.3 |
| Total Bus and Bus Facility Needs |
6,545.9 |
39,275.3 |
|
|
Replacement Buses and Vans for Expansion Vehicles: These are
replacements for new expansion vehicles that have exceeded their economic lives, with the
expansion beginning in FY 2000 in this model. Only new expansion small buses and vans will
have exceeded their economic lives by FY 2009 in this model.
Maintenance Facility Needs and Bus Other Needs: These needs are
estimated from historic federal funding ratios applied to estimated vehicle needs from FY
1991 through FY 1999, "Bus Purchases" was 50.4 percent of all federal funding
for buses, bus "Maintenance Facilities" was 11.2 percent, and "Bus
Other" was 38.4 percent. The amounts for Maintenance Facility Needs and Bus Other
Needs on Table 2 are estimated by applying these proportions to the amounts estimated for
replacement and expansion vehicles.
Core Capacity: $36.7 billion short-term; 2001 dollars.
The APTA Rail Transit CEOs Subcommittee conducted a survey of rail
transit systems in the Fall of 2001. They asked respondents to estimate their needs for
major capital investment in additional fixed guideway transit capacity to meet existing
capacity needs and to accommodate expected future demands. No time limit was included in
the question but needs are viewed as current or short-term, not long-term, needs.
Responses were received from 14 agencies which provide 64 percent of all rail transit
service measured by vehicle miles operated. The respondents reported an aggregate need of
$23.4 billion. Expanded for non-participating systems, the total need would be $36.7
billion. Inflated to 2003 dollars the average annual need is $6.5 billion and the six-year
need $38.8 billion.
The determination of whether a funding need is for core capacity,
fixed-guideway modernization, or new start funds was made by the responding transit
agency. In some cases the traffic on rail lines has reached such proportions as to exceed
the potential capacity increase of an existing line, thus an alternative new line in the
corridor is needed to alleviate congestion. It is uncertain whether responding agencies
included those new lines in core capacity or consider them to be new starts. This estimate
should, therefore, be considered a low estimate.
Incremental Needs of Small Transit Intensive Cities: $26.2 million, for
20 urbanized areas at FY 2000 appropriation levels.
Formula funding for urbanized areas with populations less than 200,000
is calculated only from population and population density data, service factors are not a
part of the formula. Because of this, some small UZAs receive smaller apportionments than
they would receive if service factors were included in their formula in the same way that
they are included for larger UZAs. The FTA The Urbanized Area Formula Program and the
Needs of Small Transit Intensive Cities, September 2000, measured this discrepancy.
The report noted that "no explicit needs assessment is made in
allocating formula funding among urbanized areas. Instead, the formula factors used can be
viewed as surrogates for the basic transit needs of local communities." (footnote,
Page 3) The FTA identified 20 small urbanized areas that met at least four of eight
criteria for small transit incentive cities. If small UZA funds had been distributed using
service factors as well as demographic factors in the same manner that funds are
distributed for larger urbanized areas, these 20 areas would have received an additional
$26.2 million in the FY 2000 apportionment. If the 20 areas received the same proportion
increase of the FY 2003 guaranteed funding level for urbanized area formula funds, their
apportionment would increase $33.6 million.
A total of 104 small urbanized areas would have received an increase in
funding if funds were distributed by a service and population formula rather than only a
population formula in FY 2000. The gain for those areas would have been $49.2 million.
Adjusted to the level of FY 2003 guaranteed appropriation levels, the increase would have
been $61.1 million.
Rural and Small UZA Needs, $16.8 billion, adjusted dollars.
The Community Transportation of America's Full Steam Ahead for
Reauthorization, July/August 2001, presents a comprehensive reauthorization proposal
for transit funding based on a projection of anticipated long-term transit funding needs.
Funding needs for several of the categories included in the proposal are included in needs
studies reported above. The proposal, however, calls for funding increases for small
urbanized areas and rural areas above the levels included above. For the six-year
reauthorization period, the CTAA proposes $8.4 billion total funding for small urbanized
areas and $8.4 billion total funding for rural areas. The proposed funding levels are for
federal funds only, hence total funding and total need would be greater than this amount.
The methodology used to arrive at the funding and supporting needs levels is not described
in the report.
Other Needs Eligible for Federal Funding Not Included in Cited Surveys:
Several other uses that are eligible for federal funding are not
included in the needs summary presented on Table 1 because they have not been estimated in
existing studies. These needs include funding for preventive maintenance, planning, and
national research and training. Minimum values for some of these programs can be estimated
from current federal spending levels.
Table 4: Needs Estimates Based on Current Federal Spending and
Appropriations
|
Program |
FY 2000 Federal
Obligations
(Millions) |
FY 2003
Guaranteed Federal Funding
(Millions) |
Estimated Needs,
See Text |
Average Annual
(Millions) |
Six-Year Total
(Millions) |
| Preventive Maintenance |
703.8 |
--- |
6,112.8 |
36,676.8 |
| ADA Complementary Paratransit Service |
16.2 |
--- |
22.0 |
132.0 |
| Job Access/Reverse Commute |
60.1 |
150.0 |
300.0 |
1,800.0 |
| Planning |
167.8 |
73.0 |
228.0 |
1,368.0 |
| Research (including University Transportation
Research) |
--- |
55.0 |
89.0 |
534.0 |
| Total All Programs |
--- |
--- |
6,751.8 |
40,510.8 |
|
|
Preventive Maintenance: Preventive maintenance is an eligible use
of federal capital funds for any maintenance purpose. Total transit expenditures for
maintenance, both vehicle and non-vehicle in 1999 were $5,648.9 million. Increased to 2003
levels based on the anticipated growth in the Consumer Price Index, preventive maintenance
expenditures would be $6,347 million. This increase does not account for any increase in
transit service. Reduced for duplication with rural costs included in the CAA estimate
above, the remaining preventive maintenance need would be $6,112.8 annually.
ADA Complementary Paratransit Service: Federal capital funds are
eligible, under certain limitations, to be used for complementary paratransit service to
meet the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). In 2000, the FTA
obligated $16.2 million for this purpose. Expanding this amount for inflation and to
account for the 80 percent federal and 20 percent local matching ratio would produce a
need of $22 million in projected 2003 dollars.
Job Access/Reverse Commute: The Job Access and Reverse Commute
program has a guaranteed authorization of $150 million in FY 2003. Because grants from
this program require a 50 percent local match, the total program level from all sources in
FY 2003 would be $300 million. The projected program level in FY 2003 is used as a
surrogate for need on Table 4.
Planning: Federal grants for planning uses from all programs
including both formula funds and planning funds were $167.8 million in FY 2000. Adjusted
for inflation to 2003 and increased to include the local matching share, the amount
becomes $228 million. This projected level is used as a surrogate for need on Table 4.
Research: The guaranteed authorization for research, including
University Transportation Centers, in FY 2003 is $55 million, 18 percent less than the
$67.4 million appropriated for these purposes in FY 1992. If the amount appropriated in FY
1992 were adjusted for inflation, its value in 2003 would be $89.9 million. An additional
$34 million in non-guaranteed funds are authorized for these programs in FY 2003 bringing
the total authorization to $89.0 million. This amount is used as a surrogate for need in
Table 4.
The sum of these needs is $6,751.8 million per year, with a six-year
total of 40,510.8 million.
Federal Transit Administration Conditions and Performance Report
Adjusted for Ridership Growth and Inflation: $140.4 billion for Six Years, 1997 dollars
for All Capital Uses from All Levels of Government.
The U.S. Department of Transportation 1999 Status of the Nation's
Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance (C&P), May 2000,
estimates an annual average transit need for the twenty-year period 1998-2017. The
estimated need is for all capital purposes including funds from all levels of government.
Needs are projected in 1997 dollars for four scenarios with the assumption of an annual
average growth in ridership of 1.9 percent. The highest category of need is to improve
conditions and improve performance of transit systems. The reported need for that category
with a 1.9 percent ridership growth is $16.0 billion per year in 1997 dollars
Data are also provided in the report that allow derivation of formulas
to estimate needs at higher levels of ridership growth. At 4.5 percent annual ridership
growth, the approximate average of the past four years, the annual funding need to improve
conditions and improve performance is $23.4 billion annually, or $140.4 billion for six
years in 1997 dollars. Inflated to 2003 dollars the annual need is $27.3 billion and the
six-year need is $164.1 billion. The procedure used to derive this estimate is presented
in detail in APTA's "Summary of Transit Funding Needs as Reported in 1999 Status
of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance,"
December 5, 2000.
Table 5 shows C&P cost estimates by categories similar to
existing transit funding categories. The first column of needs reports the actual amounts
in the C&P report in 1997 dollars with a ridership increase of 1.9 percent per
year; the second column of data reports needs estimated by APTA based on C&P
data in 1997 dollars with a ridership increase of 4.5 percent per year; and the final
column inflates amounts for the 4.5 percent ridership growth to 2003 dollars.
Table 5: 1999 Conditions and Performance, Improve Conditions and
Improve
Performance Needs Assigned to Program Categories (Millions of Dollars)
|
Need Category |
Cost Reported in
1999 Conditions and Performance (a) |
Cost with 4.5 Percent Annual
Passenger Trip Increase (b) |
Cost with 4.5 percent Growth
Inflated to FY 2003 Dollars (c) |
| Bus Replacement and Rehabilitation |
2,445 |
3,576 |
4,166 |
| Bus Expansion and New Bus |
1,548 |
2,264 |
2,638 |
| Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation |
5,639 |
8,247 |
9,609 |
| Rail Expansion and New Bus |
5,916 |
8,652 |
10,081 |
| Elderly and Disabled |
298 |
436 |
508 |
| Nonurbanized Area |
203 |
297 |
346 |
| Total |
16,049 |
23,472 |
27,347 |
(a) Improve conditions and improve performance cost with an 1.9 percent
annual passenger trip growth rate.
(b) Estimated by APTA from formulas derived from C&P
Sensitivity Analysis data.
(c) FY 2003 Consumer Price Index projections from Congressional Budget
Office The Budget and Economic Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002-2011.
References:
American Public Transit Association. May 1999. 1999 Transit Vehicle
Data Book.
American Public Transit Association. October 1999. 1999 Transit
Fixed Guideway Inventory.
American Public Transportation Association. March 2000. APTA 2000
Public Transportation Fact Book.
American Public Transportation Association. April 26, 2000.
"Estimation of Long-Term New Start Program Needs."
American Public Transportation Association. May 8, 2000.
"Projecting Bus Capital Investment Needs."
American Public Transportation Association. December 5, 2000.
"Summary of Transit Funding Needs as Reported in 1999 Status of the Nation's
Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance."
American Public Transportation Association. March 2001. APTA 2001
Public Transportation Fact Book.
Community Transportation Association of America. July/August 2001. Full
Steam Ahead for Reauthorization.
Congressional Budget Office. January 2001. The Budget and Economic
Outlook: Fiscal Years 2002-2011.
Federal Transit Administration. April 1987. Rail Modernization
Study.
Federal Transit Administration. October 1, 2001. Circular FTA C
9300.1, Capital Program: Grant Application Instructions.
Federal Transit Administration. March 2000. Annual Report on New
Starts: Proposed Allocations of Funds for Fiscal Year 2001.
Federal Transit Administration. September 2000. The Urbanized Area
Formula Program and the Needs of Small Transit Intensive Cities.
Federal Transit Administration. May 2001. Annual Report on New
Starts: Proposed Allocations of Funds for Fiscal Year 2002.
Federal Transit Administration. December 2001. Supplemental Report
on New Starts.
U.S. Department of Transportation. May 2000. 1999 Status of the
Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance.
For questions, contact John Neff, Senior Policy Researcher, at (202)
496-4812 or by E-mail at jneff@apta.com.
Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.
|
|
|