A GUIDE TO TRANSIT-RELATED PROVISIONS
(Download in Adobe PDF Format)
INTRODUCTION
This guide provides a brief summary of key transit and related provisions of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEALU), which authorizes federal transit and highway programs through Fiscal Year (FY)2009. The bill was signed into law by President Bush on August 10, 2005 (Public Law109-59).
SAFETEA-LU builds on the success of two previous surface transportation authorization laws, the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA; P.L. 102-240) andthe Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA 21; P.L. 105-178). Under it, thefederal transit program structure remains largely the same, retaining formula programs that target federal investment to systems and communities based on need and capital investment programs that address special needs and projects. Nonetheless, as summarized in this guide, the new law makes a number of changes to existing programs and adds new ones.
SAFETEA-LU represents a hard-fought victory for the public transportation
industry and is consistent with the key reauthorization goals adopted by APTA46;s
Board of Directors in 2002: grow the program; maintain funding guarantees; and
expedite program delivery.
The new bill meets these goals. It:
- Provides a record level of federal transit investment, $52.6 billion over 6 years, an increase of 46 percent over the amount guaranteed in TEA 21;
- Increases annual guaranteed transit funding from a level of $7.2 billion in FY 2003 (the last year of TEA 21) to $10.3 billion in FY 2009;
- Retains annual funding guarantees to ensure long-term funding stability; and
- Improves program delivery.
This outcome was possible because APTA member organizations
worked together, and with other transportation interest groups, to make it happen.
With great leadership provided by the APTA Executive Committee, Board of Directors
and especially our legislative leadership 50; the Big 5: Rick Bacigalupo
(Orange County), Mike Townes (Hampton Roads), Chris Boylan (New York), Dick
Ruddell (Ft. Worth), and AlanWulkan (Parsons Brinkerhoff) 50; coupled
with APTA46;s Public Transportation Partnershipfor Tomorrow (PT)2 resources
we were able to carry that message forward moreeffectively than ever before.
The results are described in this guide.
William W. Millar
President
American Public Transportation Association
September 2005
TABLE OF CONTENTS
- Summary and Overview
- Transit Provisions of SAFETEA-LU
- Planning
- Planning Programs
- Metropolitan Planning
- Statewide Planning
- Formula Programs
- Urbanized Area Formula Program
- Small Transit Intensive Cities Tier
- Operating Assistance for Small UZA
- Growing and High Density States Apportionment Factors
- Rural Formula Program
- Transit on Indian Reservations
- Elderly Individuals and Individuals with Disabilities Program
- New Freedom Program
- Job Access and Reverse Commute Program
- Capital Investment Programs
- New Starts Program
- Small Starts Program
- Alternatives Analysis
- Fixed Guideway Modernization Program
-
Bus and Bus Facilities Program
- Research
- Other Programs
- Clean Fuels Program
- Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands Program
- Project Management Oversight
- Other Transit-Related Provisions
- Non-Regulatory Notice and Comment Period
- Charter Bus
- Employee Protective Arrangements
- Buy America
- Bus Dealership Requirement
- Controlled Substances and Alcohol Misuse Testing
- Eligible Capital Expenses
- Use of Advertising and Social Service Contract Revenue Towards
Local Match
- Transit Pass Commute Benefit
- Volumetric Excise Tax Credit for Alternative Fuels
- Selected Highway Provisions
- Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement
- Bus Axle Weight Exemption
- Ferry Boats and Terminals
- Tolling Provisions
- Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program
- National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission
- National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission
- Funding Tables
SAFETEA-LU
Over two reauthorization cycles, federal public transportation investment has
more than doubled.

Summary and Overview
On July 29, 2005, the U.S. House of Representatives and Senate
approved by huge margins the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient
Transportation Equity Act - A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU). The
bill provides $286.4 billion, including $52.6 billion for transit,
through Fiscal Year (FY) 2009. The President signed the bill into
law (Public Law (P.L.) 109-59) on August 10, 2005. The President’s
signature completed a legislative process that began in 2003,
spanned two Congresses, and included two conferences and 12
extensions of TEA 21.
Transit Provisions of SAFETEA-LU
The provisions of SAFETEA-LU specifically fund the authorization
of transit and highway funds for FY 2005 through FY 2009; funding for FY 2004
was authorized by the Surface Transportation Extension Act of 2004, Part IV,
(P.L. 108-280). All amounts in this document refer to the entire SAFETEA-LU
period and include FY 2004 funds authorized by the Surface Transportation Extension
Act of 2004, Part IV. Provisions of SAFETEA-LU generally take effect at the
beginningof FY 2006 (October 1, 2005), but the law incorporates FY 2005 funding
provided in FY 2005 Appropriations law and extensions of authorizing law.
Before FY 2006, federal transit programs were funded with a
mix offunds from both the Highway Trust Fund and the General Fund,which under
congressional budgeting rules resulted in a fast 47;spend down48;
rate for Mass Transit Account funds. Beginning in FY 2006, SAFETEA-LU funds
the New Starts, Research and University ResearchCenters programs and the Federal
Transit Administration (FTA) Administrative Expenses from the General Fund,
and all other programs from the Mass Transit Account of the Highway Trust Fund.As
a result, Trust Fund spending under the transit program for the first time will
be scored in the same way that spending is scored under the highway program,
which has a significant and positive impact on the amount of funds that were
able to be made availablefor the transit program under SAFETEA-LU.
Finally, the legislation provides guaranteed annual increases in investment
for all transit programs through the use of discretionary spending offsets and
language similar to that included in TEA 21.
PLANNING PROGRAMS, 49 U.S.C. 5305
A new section 5305 contains general provisions applicable to
planning programs and continues the current division of planning
authorization between Metropolitan Planning and Statewide
Planning. The law requires the Federal Transit Administration and
Federal Highway Administration to issue final planning regulations by
August 10, 2006.
METROPOLITAN PLANNING, 49 U.S.C. 5303
All provisions for Metropolitan Planning are consolidated in
a new section 5303. The requirement for separate transportation plans and transportation
improvement programs is maintained. The Long Range Transportation Plan and the
Transportation Improvement Program are to be updated every four years. Provisions
regarding Transportation Management Areas (TMAs) are included in the metropolitan
transportation planning section. Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs)
are encouraged to consult or coordinate with planning officials responsible
for other types of planning activities affected by transportation. Safety and
security are factors to be included in metropolitan planning.
In developing a Long Range Transportation Plan, MPOs will be
required to include transit agencies in making funding estimates; consult with
state and local agencies responsible for land use management, natural resources,
environmental protection, conservation, and historic preservation; and have
a participation plan that provides reasonable opportunities for all parties
comments. TMAs must be certified every four years. Program updates of state
or MPO plans shall reflect these changes by July 1, 2007.
STATEWIDE PLANNING, 49 U.S.C. 5304
SAFETEA-LU consolidates statewide planning requirements in a new
section 5304. States are allowed to enter into agreements for the
purpose of planning cooperation and coordination for projects with
multi-State implications. States must consider the economic vitality
for rural areas as well as urbanized areas in statewide transportation
planning. The Statewide Transportation Improvement Program
(STIP) is to be updated every four years. Safety and security are
factors to be included in statewide planning.
Formula Programs
Formula programs are those under which funds are apportioned
by a formula specified in authorizing law. SAFETEA-LU moves
several programs from other categories into a new “Formula and
Bus Capital” category for authorization beginning in FY 2006. The
new aggregation of programs is intended to allow all formula
programs and the Bus Capital program to be funded from a single
authorization from the Mass Transit Account.
URBANIZED AREA FORMULA PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5307
SAFETEA-LU preserves the existing formula program and its
distribution factors, but creates several new programs or tiers to
distribute a portion of the funds to urbanized areas (UZAs). It
establishes a new tier for transit intensive urbanized areas with
fewer than 200,000 in population and extends the authority to use
formula funds for operating purposes in urbanized areas
reclassified as being larger than 200,000 in population under the
2000 Census. These changes are described in detail in the
following sections. Urbanized Area Formula Program
apportionments will include funds apportioned under a new
Growing States and High Density States program described below.
The transit enhancement program will be administered by
certification, and a grantee must submit an annual report of such
projects to the FTA.
SMALL TRANSIT INTENSIVE CITIES TIER, 49 U.S.C. 5336(j)
SAFETEA-LU includes APTA’s proposal to create a tier in the
Urbanized Area Formula program that would distribute funds to
small UZAs with fewer than 200,000 population that provide transit
service above a certain level. The new tier will be funded at 1
percent of all UZA formula funds annually beginning in FY 2006.
The criteria are passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue mile;
passenger miles traveled per vehicle revenue hour; vehicle revenue
miles per capita; vehicle revenue hours per capita; passenger miles
traveled per capita; and passengers per capita.
OPERATING ASSISTANCE FOR SMALL UZAS, 49 U.S.C.
5307(b)(2)
Transit agencies in urbanized areas that grew from fewer than
200,000 in population under the 1990 Census to more than 200,000 in population under the 2000 Census may continue to use
formula funds for operating expenses in FY 2005 at 100 percent of
their FY 2002 apportionment, in FY 2006 at 50 percent of their FY
2002 apportionment, and in FY 2007 at 25 percent of their FY 2002
apportionment.
GROWING AND HIGH DENSITY STATES FORMULA FACTORS,
49 U.S.C 5340
New Growing States and High Density States Formula Factors
distribute funds to the urbanized area formula and rural formula
programs under new factors. One-half of the funds are made
available under the Growing States factors and are apportioned by a
formula based on state population forecasts for 15 years beyond the
most recent Census; amounts apportioned for each state are then
distributed between urbanized areas and rural areas based on the
ratio of urban/rural population within each state. The High Density
States factors distribute the other half of the funds to states with
population densities in excess of 370 persons per square mile. These
funds are apportioned only to urbanized areas within those states.
RURAL FORMULA PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5311
SAFETEA-LU significantly increases funding for the rural program of
the transit formula program. A new formula tier based on land area
is established to address the needs of low-density states (20 percent
of section 5311 funds are distributed through this tier). Indian tribes
are added as eligible recipients, and a portion of funding is set aside
each year for Indian tribes - $8 million in FY 2006 and rising to $15
million by FY 2009. Rural transit systems receiving formula funds
will be required to report data to the National Transit Database. The
sliding scale federal match under the federal highway program for
states with a high percentage of federal lands is applicable under the
section 5311 program. The current practice of requiring the
Secretary of Labor to use a special warranty for section 5333
employee protective arrangements (formerly known as section
13(c)) is now codified in law. The Rural Transportation Assistance
Program (RTAP) is funded with a 2 percent set aside of the Rural
Formula program rather than from the Research program as under
current law. Up to 15 percent of such funds can be used by FTA to
carry out national projects. Rural Formula program
apportionments will include funds apportioned from the Growing
States program.
TRANSIT ON INDIAN RESERVATIONS, 49 U.S.C. 5311(c)
Indian tribes are added as eligible recipients for rural formula
funds, and a portion of rural formula funding is set aside each year
for Indian tribes - $8 million in FY 2006 and rising to $15 million
by FY 2009.
ELDERLY INDIVIDUALS AND INDIVIDUALS WITH
DISABILITIES PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5310
SAFETEA-LU maintains the current program for special needs of
elderly individuals and individuals with disabilities. Because of strong
interest in extending the authority to use section 5310 grant funds for
operating assistance, a new seven-state pilot program is established for
fiscal years 2006 through 2009 to determine whether expanded
authority to use up to 33 percent of the funds apportioned under
section 5310 for operating costs improves services to elderly
individuals and individuals with disabilities. Four of the states in the
pilot program are specified in law – Wisconsin, Alaska, Minnesota,
and Oregon – along with three other states to be selected by the
Secretary.
NEW FREEDOM PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5317
A new program called the New Freedom Program will provide
formula funding for new transportation services and public
transportation alternatives beyond those required by ADA to assist
persons with disabilities. The New Freedom Program will be
apportioned using a formula based on the disabled population in a
state, with 60 percent of the funds apportioned to urbanized areas
with populations larger than 200,000, 20 percent to states for use in
urbanized areas of fewer than 200,000, and 20 percent to states for
use in rural areas. Funds will be made available to transit systems
and the states. The program contains language mandating
coordination of transportation services with other federal human
service programs. The law’s legislative history specifies that
employee protective arrangements under section 5333 (formerly
known as section 13(c)) do not apply to this new program.
JOB ACCESS AND REVERSE COMMUTE (JARC) PROGRAM,
49 U.S.C. 5316
The JARC program is changed to become a formula program rather
than the existing competitive discretionary grants program. The
formula is based on ratios involving the number of eligible lowincome
and welfare recipients with 60 percent of funds going to
urban areas with more than 200,000 population, 20 percent for
urban areas with fewer than 200,000 population, and 20 percent to
rural areas. SAFETEA-LU contains report language directing the FTA
to continue its practice of providing maximum flexibility to job
access projects designed to meet the needs of individuals who are
not effectively served by public transportation. Coordination is
required between private, non-profit, and public transportation
providers and other federal programs in the JARC program, the New
Freedom Program, and the Elderly and Disabled program.
Capital
Investment
Programs
Capital Investment programs provide funds for transit capital
projects that meet specific criteria either by allocation where the
project is named or by apportionment under a formula. Capital
Investment Projects include the New Starts, Fixed Guideway
Modernization, and Bus and Bus Facilities programs. For
authorization of amounts for SAFETEA-LU, however, Fixed Guideway
Modernization and Bus and Bus Capital programs are included
under authorizations for Formula and Bus Capital Programs
beginning in FY 2006.
NEW STARTS PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5309
SAFETEA-LU does not change the basic New Starts program or the
current federal share of 80 percent. A new Small Starts Program is
created for smaller projects with a federal share of less than $75
million (see below).
The current three-level rating system for New Starts is replaced by a
five-level system - High, Medium High, Medium, Medium-Low, Low.
Economic development/land use is explicitly added to the project
justification criteria. A grantee will be allowed to keep a portion of
the cost savings when projects are completed under budget. A higher
than requested federal share can be provided for projects which
keep cost and ridership estimates within 10 percent of the forecasts used as basis for establishing locally preferred alternative. FTA is to implement New Start Program changes by a rulemaking. There is apilot program to demonstrate the benefits of public/private partnerships.
The FTA annually is to issue a contractor performance assessment
report to analyze the consistency and accuracy of cost and ridership estimates
made by contractors developing major capital investments.The FTA may take into
consideration extenuating factors outside thecontrol of a contractor in making
its evaluations. The New Starts program is identified as section 5309(m)(1)(A)
in FY 2005 andsection 5309(m)(2)(A) beginning in FY 2006. In prior years it
had been identified as section 5309(m)(1)(B).
The law includes four categories of earmarks: specific annual funding levels
for projects that have Full Funding Grant Agreements; a listing without any
funding amounts for projects authorized forfinal design and construction grants;
a listing without any funding amounts for projects authorized for preliminary
engineering grants; and a listing with maximum amounts during the SAFETEA-LU
period for additional projects not categorized by their status.
Also under the New Starts program, $20 million is made available annually for ferry boats or related facilities for projects in Alaska and Hawaii.
SMALL STARTS PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5309(e)
A new “Small Starts” (Capital Investment Grants Less Than
$75,000,000) program would provide funding for smaller projects
with a federal New Starts share of less than $75 million, including
streetcar, trolley, bus rapid transit (if a substantial portion of the
project operates in a separate right of way in a defined corridor
dedicated for public transit use during peak hours or it has other
characteristics of a fixed guideway system), and commuter rail
projects. Small Starts projects may not total more than $250
million. Simplified procedures and criteria apply to the program.
The program will be funded with a $200 million takedown from the
New Starts apportionment annually beginning in FY 2007.
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS, 49 U.S.C. 5339
A new Alternatives Analysis programs provides $25 million annually
beginning in FY 2006 for new fixed guideway investment alternatives analyses.
Earmarks are included for FY 2006 and FY 2007.
FIXED GUIDEWAY MODERNIZATION PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5309
The Fixed Guideway Modernization program is unchanged. It isclassified as a formula program for authorization in SAFETEA-LU but remains in the section 5309 Capital Investment program and is identified as section 5309(m)(1)(B) in FY 2005 and section5309(m)(2)(B) beginning in FY 2006. In prior years it had been identified as section 5309(m)(1)(A). Fixed Guideway Modernization apportionment factors in section 5337 are not changed.
BUS AND BUS FACILITIES PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5309
Bus and Bus Facilities is classified as a formula program for
authorization in SAFETEA-LU but remains in the section 5309 Capital Investment
program and is identified as section 5309(m)(1)(C) inFY 2005 and section 5309(m)(2)(C)
beginning in FY 2006. SAFETEA-LU makes few changes to the program, but provides
significant increases in funding. Some 600 earmarks are included in this section;
these earmarks cover about half of the Bus and Bus Facilities program resources
in each fiscal year through FY 2009. A new intermodal facilities program is
established with a $35 million annual set aside from the discretionary bus program.
The intercity portion of intermodal terminals is eligible for funding under
this program if the facility serves as a connector to public transportation.
In addition, $10 million is now available annually under the Bus Program for
ferry boats or related terminals with the funds earmarked for specific projects.
Research
The research programs are generally unchanged. The Transit
Cooperative Research Program grows from its current fixed amount
of $8.2 million a year to $10 million in FY 2009. A number of
studies and entities are funded from the national research program:
a National Academy of Sciences study of 38 transit systems ability to
accommodate evacuation in times of emergency; Center for Transit
Oriented Development at $1 million a year; transportation equity
research program to assess transportation impacts on transit
dependent at $1 million a year; transit career ladder training
program at $1 million a year; pilot program for remote infrared
audible signs $500,000 per year; hydrogen fuel cell shuttle
deployment demonstration project at $800,000 each year for two
years; human services transportation coordination at $1.6 million
per year; Portland streetcar prototype deployment at $1 million per
year; public transportation participation pilot program at $1 million
a year; transportation infrastructure and logistics research at
$500,000 a year for University of Alabama at Huntsville; National
Bus Rapid Transit Institute at $1.75 million a year for University of
South Florida; ITS application at $400,000 for Northern Kentucky
University; ITS pilot project at $465,000 for Ohio State; regional
public safety training center at $500,000 a year for Lehigh-Carbon
Community College; transit security training facility at $750,000 for
Chester Community College; Small Urban and Rural Transit Center
$800,000 per year at North Dakota State University; advanced
technology BRT at $500,000 per year for Connecticut project; New
Haven fuel cell-powered bus research at approximately $500,000 a
year; Center for Advanced Transportation Initiatives at approximately
$500,000 a year at Rutgers; New Jersey Institute of Technology
TELUS program at approximately $500,000 a year; Southern
California regional transit training consortium pilot program at
$540,000 a year.
Other
Programs
CLEAN FUELS PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5308
The Clean Fuels grant program is reauthorized with some
modifications. Grants would be provided for the purchase of clean
fuels buses, including clean diesel vehicles (up to 25 percent of
grants annually), in certain non-attainment areas and areas trying to
maintain compliance with clean air standards. Grants are
discretionary.
ALTERNATIVE TRANSPORTATION IN PARKS AND PUBLIC LANDS PROGRAM, 49 U.S.C. 5320
SAFETEA-LU establishes a new program to develop publictransportation in National Parks, with the goal of improving mobilityand reducing congestion and pollution. The Departments of Transportation and Interior will work cooperatively to develop and select capital or planning projects. Employee protective arrangements under section 5333 (formerly known as section13(c)) do not apply to this new program.
PROJECT MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT (PMO), 49 U.S.C. 5327
The takedown for Project Management Oversight is increased to 0.75 percent for section 5307 UZA Formula funds and to 1.0 percent forsection 5309 Capital Investment programs. New 0.5 percent PMO takedowns will apply to section 5305 Planning, section 5310 Elderly Persons and Persons with Disabilities, and section 5320 Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands programs. The 0.5 percent PMO takedown for section 5311 Rural funds remains the same.47;Safety and security management48; are added to project management and oversight review requirements.
Other
Transit-
Related
Programs
NON-REGULATORY NOTICE AND COMMENT PERIOD,
49 U.S.C. 5334 (l)
The law adds a new section that requires FTA to subject non-regulatory
substantive policy statements that impose a binding obligation on
recipients to a 60-day public review notice and comment period.
CHARTER BUS, 49 U.S.C. 5323(d)
SAFETEA-LU permits the partial withholding of federal funds by the
FTA in the case of a continuing pattern of violations of the charter or
school bus law and regulations. Report language accompanying the
bill calls for a negotiated rulemaking by the FTA to consider ways to
improve the charter bus complaint and appeals process; improve the
administration and enforcement of the charter bus regulation,
including use of the internet to help communications; and to consider whether there are potential limited conditions under which
public transit agencies can provide community-based charter
services directly to local governments and private non-profit
agencies that would not otherwise be served in a cost-effective
manner by private operators. Under a negotiated rulemaking, a
balanced group representing public and private interests would
meet with a representative of the FTA as part of a federally chartered
advisory committee to negotiate the text of a proposed rule.
Meetings are to be announced in the Federal Register and are open
to the general public. If the group cannot agree on the text of a
proposed rule, FTA would draft it.
EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE ARRANGEMENTS, 49 U.S.C 5333
(FORMERLY KNOWN AS SECTION 13(c))
Employee protective arrangements, formerly known as section
“13(c),” do not apply to two new programs created under the bill, the New Freedom
and Alternative Transportation in Parks and Public Lands Programs. The bill
codifies the Department of Labor (DOL) “Las Vegas” decision relating to contractor-to-contractor
issues in cases involving buses as embodied in DOL letters dated September 21
and November 7, 1994. Further, the administrative special warranty for section
5311 programs is now codified in law and grants for purchase of like-kind equipment
do not have to be referred to DOL prior to certification.
BUY AMERICA, 49 U.S.C. 5323(j)
Language is included in SAFETEA-LU requiring FTA to conduct a
rulemaking on the Buy America program to clarify that the
microprocessor waiver is limited to computers and similar devices;
to define end product to ensure that major systems procurements
are not used to circumvent Buy America and that such definition
include a list of representative items subject to the Buy America
requirements; provide for non-availability waivers after contract
award; and to clarify that it is the certification submitted with a final
offer that applies to a negotiated procurement.
BUS DEALERSHIP REQUIREMENT, 49 U.S.C. 5325(i)
The law provides that no state law requiring buses to be purchased
through in-State dealers shall apply to vehicles purchased with a
grant under the federal transit program.
CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES AND ALCOHOL MISUSE TESTING,
49 U.S.C. 5331
The law provides flexibility to permit a transit system to comply with
one DOT modal drug and alcohol testing program rather than having
to comply separately with different DOT modal drug and alcohol
testing programs.
ELIGIBLE CAPITAL EXPENSES, 49 U.S.C. 5302(a)(1)
The definition of an eligible capital project for mass transportation
improvement is expanded by adding construction, renovation, and
improvement of intercity bus and intercity rail stations and terminals.
New eligible capital project categories are added: crime prevention
and security including security and emergency response plans,
chemical and biological agent detection, emergency response drills,
and security training for employees; establishing a debt service
reserve; and mobility management. Mobility management is
described as “projects for improving coordination among public
transportation and other transportation service providers”, and
could include, among other things, the employment of personnel to
coordinate the full array of transportation options through a
clearinghouse function. Further, a transit system may allow the
incidental use of federally funded alternative fueling facilities and
equipment by nontransit public entities and private entities so long
as funds earned are used for transit purposes.
USE OF ADVERTISING AND SOCIAL SERVICE CONTRACT
REVENUE TOWARDS LOCAL MATCH
The legislation allows additional funds to be used for the local match.
Advertising and concession revenues can be used to match Urbanized
Area Formula funds. Amounts appropriated or otherwise made available to
a department or agency of the Government (other than the Department
of Transportation) that are eligible to be expended for transportation
can be used to match Elderly and Disabled, Rural, JARC, and New
Freedom grants. Funds from section 403(a)(5)(C)(vii) of the Social
Security Act (42 U.S.C. 603(a)(5)(C)(vii)) can be used to match
Urbanized Area Formula, Elderly and Disabled, Rural, JARC, and New
Freedom grants. Amounts received under a service agreement with a
state or local social service agency or private social service organization
can be used to match Elderly and Disabled, Rural, JARC, and New Freedom
grants. Proceeds from the issuance of revenue bonds can be used to match
Urbanized Area Formula and Capital Investment grants for capital projects.
TRANSIT PASS COMMUTE BENEFIT, SECTION 3049 OF
SAFETEA-LU
The law preserves the current limitation for qualified transportation
fringe benefits for transit and vanpools at $105 per month (with
indexing for inflation). It also codifies Executive Order #13150
which requires federal agencies in the Washington, D.C. National
Capital Region to provide employees with tax-free transit benefits to
cover commuting costs up to the maximum allowed by law. It
extends benefits, beyond those provided in the Executive Order, to
federal employees in the National Capital Region who work for the
legislative and judicial branches or for independent agencies.
VOLUMETRIC EXCISE TAX CREDIT FOR ALTERNATIVE FUELS,
SECTION 11113 OF TITLE XI OF SAFETEA-LU
Two new excise tax credits are made available under SAFTEA-LU’s
tax title for alternative fuels and alternative fuel mixtures used in
highway-use vehicles. The law provides a 50 cent per gallon tax
credit for alternative fuel or gasoline gallon equivalents for non
liquid alternative fuels. While this tax credit would be provided to
the producer of such fuels, some of the benefit of the credit may
accrue to the users, including transit and other municipal agencies
that are not taxpaying entities.
Selected Highway Provisions
The following selected sections of the highway provisions are
included because of their significance to the federal transit program
but represent only a small portion of the highway provisions in
SAFETEA-LU.
CONGESTION MITIGATION AND AIR QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT (CMAQ), 23 U.S.C. 149
A new requirement is established that states and MPOs give priority
consideration to projects and programs for diesel retrofits, other
cost-effective emission reduction activities, and cost-effective
congestion mitigation activities that provide air quality benefits. Also
established is a requirement to evaluate and assess a representative
sample of CMAQ projects to determine the direct and indirect impact of the projects on air quality and congestion levels; and
ensure the effective implementation of the program. The
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is to publish a list of
approved diesel retrofit technologies and the emission reduction
effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the technologies.
BUS AXLE WEIGHT EXEMPTION, SECTION 1023(h)(1) OF
THE INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY
ACT OF 1991
The current exemption from axle-weight limitations for transit buses
and over-the-road buses is extended through September 30, 2009.
FERRY BOATS AND TERMINALS, 23 U.S.C. 149
A new program for the construction of ferry boats and terminals is
established, funded at $38 million in FY 2005 and increasing
annually to $67 million by FY 2009. Additional sums as may be
necessary are provided. A national ferry database will be
established. Included in program priorities are ferries that carry the
greatest number of passengers in passenger-only service.
TOLLING PROVISIONS, SECTION 1604 OF SAFETEA-LU AND
23 U.S.C. 166
An express lane demonstration program is established which permits
excess revenues to be used for transit purposes eligible under Title
49. SAFETEA-LU gives states more flexibility to use road pricing
strategies as a congestion management and transportation finance
tool. States are given latitude in the operation of High Occupancy
Toll (HOT) lanes, allowing priority consideration for use of toll
revenues for alternatives (such as transit) to single occupant
vehicles. In addition, the Federal Highway Administration’s Value
Pricing Pilot Program is continued and enhanced along with several
other pilot and demonstration programs to encourage congestion
strategies aimed at air quality, energy conservation and efficiency.
New provisions allow state/local governments expanded use of “toll
credits” for local match for federal highway and transit projects -
revenues from toll facilities may be counted as local matching funds
regardless of whether or not federal funds were or are used for the
toll facility.
TRANSPORTATION, COMMUNITY, AND SYSTEM PRESERVATION PROGRAM, SECTION 1117 OF SAFETEA-LU
Funding for the Federal Highway Administration Transportation, Community, and System Preservation Program (TCSP) is increased from the current $25 million annual amount to a new annual levelof $61 million. Transit and highway projects that enhance transit oriented development are eligible, along with other broad categories of projects that improve the efficiency of thetransportation system and reduce its impacts on the environment.
NATIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION POLICY AND REVENUE STUDY COMMISSION, SECTION 1909 OF TITLE I OF SAFETEA-LU
A new commission will be created to study and report on thecurrent condition and future needs of the surface transportation system, and potential funding to meet such needs. It specifically identifies public transportation infrastructure and facilities as part of the surface transportation system to be considered, and directs the commission to consider needs related to emergency preparedness and evacuation using the system and alternatives to address environmental concerns associated with the system.
NATIONAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING COMMISSION, SECTION 1142 OF TITLE XI OF SAFETEA-LU
Another commission will be created to complete a study of the Highway Trust Fund revenues and the impacts of these revenues for future highway and transit needs. Among the considerations will be alternative approaches to generating revenues for the Highway Trust Fund.
VISION
Be the leading force in advancing public transportation.
MISSION
To strengthen and improve public transportation, APTA
serves and leads its diverse membership through advocacy,
innovation, and information sharing.
American Public Transportation Association
1666 K Street, NW
Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20006
www.apta.com
APTA EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
| Richard A. White |
Chair |
| Ronald L. Barnes |
First Vice Chair |
| Paul P. Skoutelas |
Secretary-Treasurer |
| George F. Dixon III |
Immediate Past Chair |
| VICE CHAIRS |
| Richard J. Bacigalupo |
Government Affairs |
| Mattie P. Carter |
Transit Board Members |
| Michael P. DePallo |
Rail Transit |
| Nathaniel P. Ford, Sr. |
Management and Finance |
| Fred M. Gilliam |
Bus and Paratransit Operations |
| Kim R. Green |
Business Members |
| John M. Inglish |
Research and Technology |
| William D. Lochte |
Business Member-at-Large |
| Gary W. McNeil |
Canadian Members |
| Jeffrey A. Nelson |
Small Operations |
| Joshua W. Shaw |
State Affairs |
| David L. Turney |
Marketing |
| Kathryn D. Waters |
Commuter and Intercity Rail |
| Linda S. Watson |
Human Resources |
Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.