Click here to skip navigation American Public Transportation Association Visit the APTA Bookstore
My APTA
What's New
About APTA
For Members
Committees
Conferences & Calendar
Services & Programs
Government Affairs
Industry Information
APTA Standards Program
Media Center
e-Business
Passenger Transport
Book Store
Links
Contact Us
Site Map
Home
Rail and Bus LinksThe Rail Station
May 09, 2008
APTA    Search: Click here to search
APTA > Services & Programs  

Bus Safety Awards

(Download this document in Adobe PDF format)

(Download the nomination form only)

The APTA Bus Safety Awards program recognizes transportation systems and transit contractors for their commitment to improving the safety of transit employees, customers, and communities through application of effective safety initiatives. The award recipients should demonstrate exemplary achievements in the development and implementation of educational, training, and supportive programs that create and sustain a culture of safety within the workplace and result in exceptional service. Public transportation systems are divided into categories based upon annual, unlinked passenger trips:

  • Public transportation systems providing fewer than 1 million annual passenger trips

  • Public transportation systems providing more than 1 million and fewer than 4 million annual passenger trips

  • Public transportation systems providing more than 4 million and fewer than 30 million annual passenger trips

  • Public transportation systems providing more than 30 million annual passenger trips

  • Private companies providing contracted transportation management and services to public transportation systems

This year’s awards program introduces enhancements designed to not only recognize exceptional safety performance for individual transit providers, but to also better serve the industry by benchmarking successful programs for others to adopt.

Private transit providers are expected to meet the same threshold of excellence in safety as public transportation systems; however, private operators typically are not responsible for public outreach and education. Therefore, private operators have been placed in a separate category. The criteria for evaulating private operators are identical to those for public transportation systems. Entries by private operators are considered to be corporate level; the information submitted should therefore be include all contracted services.

Evaluation Criteria

Effectiveness 30 percent
Benefit Level 35 percent
Innovation 20 percent
Transferability 15 percent

SAFETY PROGRAM/PROJECT

Effectiveness – 30 PERCENT

Creating a safety culture within the organization begins at the top. The organization should be able to demonstrate a high level of resource allocation and management participation in the development and implementation of safety initiatives. When considering whether to enter your program, ask yourself: “Does the program/project have a clear focus with specific intended results?” The organization should also be able to demonstrate solid and progressive results tied to overall agency goals and objectives. “Is there before/after data that will support the efficacy of the program/project?” At a minimum, each organization must submit its safety data for the previous three years to demonstrate how the program or practice has effectively influenced the achievement of goals and objectives. “Does data support that reductions are being sustained?” Data must be clearly defined and all data submitted must be validated and approved in writing by the organization’s chief executive officer (president, general manager). “Can the program/project be reasonably assumed to have led to the improvements?” Other types of data to document safety performance might include:

  • Statistics on accident claims paid indicating the economic
    benefit of safety improvements

  • Data reflecting reduction in on-the-job injuries related
    to a specific initiative

  • Trend data on public comments related to operator
    driving safety

Benefit Level – 35 PERCENT

The bottom line of an effective safety program should be reflected in the organization’s key performance metrics. Organizations should submit evaluations of safety projects, programs, and initiatives that reflect the benefits the organization has derived from the program or practice. Organizations should be able to demonstrate gains or efficiencies in a variety of formats by being able to address some of the following questions:

  • What net financial benefits were accrued through implementation of this program/project?

  • How do direct savings compare to the program/project costs?

  • What indirect or non-financial benefits were achieved?

  • Did the program/project address a significant issue facing the agency?

Innovation – 20 PERCENT

Bus transportation is a dynamic, constantly changing environment that challenges organizations to adapt to new situations. A systematic approach to safety must include
consideration of ongoing changes within this environment. The organization should be able to demonstrate methods used to advance safety issues that address these external or internal circumstances. Organizations should submit descriptions of innovative efforts that have a positive effect on the operating environment and the safety of drivers, pedestrians, passengers, or the public who are the principal inhabitants of that locale. Your submission should illustrate the following:

  • How does this program/project differ from traditional approaches to the problem?

  • Does the program/project enhance common practices?

  • Does the program/project reflect a totally new or unusual approach?

  • How do the unique or innovative attributes of this program/project contribute to the effectiveness/benefits achieved?

Transferability – 15 PERCENT

To be considered an Industry Leading Effective Practice, other transit providers must be able to replicate the program and implement it with similar results. Measures viewed as promising can then be implemented within other systems, which over time improves the entire industry. Organizations should submit descriptions of initiatives they developed that can address the following:

  • Does this program/project address an issue that is of significance to many agencies?

  • Can the program/project be reasonably incorporated by other agencies?

  • Is the program/project likely to be more attractive than other existing approaches to the same types of safety issues?

These questions and examples are provided only as a guide. A single program could relate to multiple criteria.

Nomination Procedures

Read each of the foregoing descriptions carefully before preparing a nomination. Please use the nomination form as a cover sheet. Use additional sheets as necessary. The form must be signed by your agency’s chief executive officer/general manager. No fee is required to enter the competition.

Award Nomination Selection

The APTA Bus Safety Committee will appoint an awards subcommittee to determine the winners in each category as specified. The winners will be announced at the APTA Bus and Paratransit Conference, May 4-7, 2008, in Austin, TX.

Awards

Within each category, one award and/or a certificate will be presented. These are:

  • Gold Award—presented to the system from each category with the best overall safety record

  • Certificate of Achievement—presented to the system from each category considered by the subcommittee as a finalist in competition for the gold award of that category

   

Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.