Click here to skip navigation American Public Transportation Association Visit the APTA Bookstore
My APTA
What's New
About APTA
For Members
Committees
Conferences & Calendar
Services & Programs
Government Affairs
Industry Information
APTA Standards Program
Media Center
e-Business
Passenger Transport
Book Store
Links
Contact Us
Site Map
Home
Rail and Bus LinksThe Rail Station
October 13, 2008
APTA    Search: Click here to search
APTA > Services & Programs > International Transit > International Focus  

Helping Travelers with Disabilities in Scandinavia

Scandinavian citizens with disabilities benefit from an exemplary level of public concern and the commitment of policy makers to provide resources adequate to ensure their mobility. While the U.S. has made huge strides in achieving access for persons with disabilities since the passage of the Americans with Disabilities Act seven years ago, there is still a great deal transit professionals in this country can learn from their Scandinavian colleagues. One such example is "Service Routes," in the view of Connie Soper of the Metropolitan Transportation Commission in Oakland, Calif., who has worked for 15 years in providing accessible transportation for the handicapped.

Soper was selected to join a team led by Shirley DeLibero of New Jersey Transit Corporation that visited three Scandinavian countries last summer to learn firsthand about innovative transportation arrangements. The Transit Cooperative Research Program provides professionals such as Soper the opportunity to gain overseas experience and network with counterparts in other countries. Because of her concern with accessibility, Soper took a close look at mobility programs in Finland, Sweden, and Denmark.

By Connie L. Soper

Senior Planner

Metropolitan Transportation Commission

Oakland, Calif.

Having long heard about Scandinavia's progressive social policies, I was curious to learn more about transportation services offered for persons with disabilities and for the elderly in the cities we visited.

While 10 years ago the Scandinavians (especially the Swedes) were at the forefront of innovations for accessible services, so much progress has been made in this country since the passage of the ADA in 1990 that differences now are less apparent. But still, plenty of lessons can be learned from our Scandinavian counterparts on providing accessible transportation services.

One could argue that ensuring accessibility on older rail systems is the largest ADA challenge faced by transit operators in this country. Surprisingly, Scandinavian heavy rail systems are more accessible than other modes, such as bus or light rail. In Helsinki, Finland; Stockholm, Sweden; and Copenhagen, Denmark, rail stations are equipped with elevators, tactile warning strips for the visually impaired, either low floor or ramped access to rail cars, and other accommodations.

Stockholm's Metro system, one of the 12 largest in the world, was originally built in the 1940s. Plans for greater accessibility were adopted in connection with the second major expansion of the system, completed during the 1960s, when elevators and escalators were installed in most stations. Further improvements have been made since then.

One innovative feature is an automatic train announcement system, triggered by a sensor on the platform when a person steps in front of it. A pre-taped announcement informs the customer when the next train is coming. In the future, elevators will also be equipped with audible signals to help the visually impaired better navigate the station.

Elevators have been installed next to escalators at a slant (parallel to the escalators), similar to a funicular. Because of the glass walls and being directly adjacent to the escalators, elevator passengers can easily signal for assistance should the elevator malfunction. Furthermore, the glass walls certainly deter vandalism, a chronic problem in American subways.

American architects and transit planners, especially those having to make key stations accessible according to ADA standards, can learn from some of the innovative design features observed in Scandinavia. Many of these features are aesthetically pleasing as well as practical.

In Copenhagen, for example, the design of the new S-Train takes into consideration the desire of passengers to see the length of the train. Cars are connected with automatic glass doors that respond to the touch of a hand. This results in a spacious, open atmosphere for travelers and also makes passengers feel less vulnerable, a fear that may keep the elderly or those with mobility impairments from using public transit.

As in the United States, the trend in Scandinavia is to use low floor buses to provide accessibility to wheelchair users. Throughout Scandinavia, planners were quick to point out the benefits of low floor buses for other passengers as well, especially parents with baby strollers.

In both Helsinki and Stockholm, a parent with a baby in a stroller can ride for free, and bus schedules indicate which vehicles have low floors. The same space designated for wheelchair users is also made available for strollers, and in some cases special securing devices for strollers have been installed.

Unlike the extensive transit training efforts in this country, Scandinavia shows little or no attempt to encourage accessible bus use by wheelchair riders through special training programs. Because a high level of paratransit service is available, the use of this alternative mode is promoted actively, even though fixed route service may allow greater independence for the traveler with disabilities and is more cost-effective for the transit operator.

In comparison with the extensive requirements of the ADA, in Scandinavia the provision of transportation is not generally recognized as a responsibility of the transit district. Rather, paratransit tends to be managed and/or financially supported by social service agencies.

In all three countries visited, paratransit is extremely well funded. National legislation in Finland requires that qualified individuals be provided a minimum of 18 trips per month, a standard of service somewhat consistent throughout the region. The majority of paratransit trips in Helsinki are provided by taxi. To accommodate wheelchairs, 2,000 of 9,000 taxis are ramped, an unusually high rate compared to other countries.

The paratransit program in Stockholm is governed by a board within the Stockholm City Council, and does not operate under the auspices of Stockholm Transit. Its annual budget is approximately $111 million, or roughly 12 percent of the Stockholm Transit budget. About 5 percent of the city's population is entitled to receive paratransit services, which is primarily provided by taxi. Service is provided door-to-door with some personal assistance from the driver.

The Gothenburg (Sweden) Transit Authority Special Transport Office currently serves 26,000 customers with 100 employees. The system provides 6,500 trips per day (or 2.1 million trips per year) with an annual budget of $30 million. All trips are dispatched from a central location, and customers can reserve trips up to two weeks ahead. Immediate demand response trips are available as well.

Paratransit services in Copenhagen have been publicly funded since 1979. Service is provided with 200 contract vehicles (mini-vans) and is door-to-door, including stair assistance. The service runs around the clock, seven days a week, and eligible persons are allowed up to 26 trips per quarter (104 trips per year), although extra trips can be arranged at a premium cost.

No medically related trips are provided through this program. Half the users are in wheelchairs, and the average age of a user of the system is 75.5 years old.

Unlike Helsinki and Stockholm, only 2 percent of the trips in Copenhagen are provided by taxi; the vast majority are provided by mini-vans. Paratransit managers interviewed on this mission said long-term program goals are to examine methods of improving efficiencies through improved technology, competitive bidding, and installation of new equipment such as updated telephone systems.

The application of related technology, such as automated vehicle locators and geographic information systems, is also being considered but not yet in place. Extensive use of advanced technology related to paratransit operations was not observed in any of the cities visited.

In addition to providing some accessible fixed routes and a comprehensive level of paratransit, the three countries in Scandinavia also operate "service routes," a unique hybrid of fixed route and paratransit. Originally developed in Sweden, service routes are now in use throughout that country, as well as in Helsinki and Copenhagen.

Service routes operate with small, low floor vehicles on a designated route and schedule. The routes have been developed specifically to serve a particular clientele, usually senior citizens, and tend to be neighborhood-oriented. In many cases, the vehicle can be flagged down along the route if the rider has difficulty getting to the nearest stop, and extra assistance is provided by the driver.

In Stockholm, a total of 15 service routes operate between 9 a.m. and 3 p.m., at a frequency of 30 minutes to one hour. The routes have been planned with input from various constituency groups. Gothenburg has two service routes, and Copenhagen Transit operates several as well. As with other aspects of transit observed in these countries, the operation of service routes is competitively bid.

This type of service has a lot of potential for adaptation and implementation in the United States. To date, transit operator efforts have been focused on providing a complementary paratransit program that meets standards established in the legislation, such as a lack of capacity constraints, by the January 1997 deadline. While nearly all transit operators are currently in compliance with the law, they are struggling to maintain compliance as demand continues to escalate. Many are employing the use of technology or seeking other strategies to help them provide paratransit in a more cost-effective manner.

Some operators (most notably Madison, Wis.) have been experimenting with alternative service delivery methods such as service routes, but few have had an opportunity or developed the expertise to do so. In many communities, service routes could be targeted for persons who are conditionally ADA eligible, or who could use fixed route services if they were more "user friendly."

Return To International Focus

   

Some of these pages may include links to documents in the Adobe PDF format. Please download the Adobe PDF reader if you have not already done so.